How to translate text using browser tools
1 February 2004 The Case for Regime-based Water Quality Standards
GEOFFREY C. POOLE, JASON B. DUNHAM, DRUSCILLA M. KEENAN, SALLY T. SAUTER, DALE A. McCULLOUGH, CHRISTOPHER MEBANE, JEFFREY C. LOCKWOOD, DON A. ESSIG, MARK P. HICKS, DEBRA J. STURDEVANT, ELIZABETH J. MATERNA, SHELLEY A. SPALDING, JOHN RISLEY, MARIANNE DEPPMAN
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Conventional water quality standards have been successful in reducing the concentration of toxic substances in US waters. However, conventional standards are based on simple thresholds and are therefore poorly structured to address human-caused imbalances in dynamic, natural water quality parameters, such as nutrients, sediment, and temperature. A more applicable type of water quality standard—a “regime standard”—would describe desirable distributions of conditions over space and time within a stream network. By mandating the protection and restoration of the aquatic ecosystem dynamics that are required to support beneficial uses in streams, well-designed regime standards would facilitate more effective strategies for management of natural water quality parameters.

GEOFFREY C. POOLE, JASON B. DUNHAM, DRUSCILLA M. KEENAN, SALLY T. SAUTER, DALE A. McCULLOUGH, CHRISTOPHER MEBANE, JEFFREY C. LOCKWOOD, DON A. ESSIG, MARK P. HICKS, DEBRA J. STURDEVANT, ELIZABETH J. MATERNA, SHELLEY A. SPALDING, JOHN RISLEY, and MARIANNE DEPPMAN "The Case for Regime-based Water Quality Standards," BioScience 54(2), 155-161, (1 February 2004). https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0155:TCFRWQ]2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 February 2004
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

KEYWORDS
ecosystem dynamics
regimes
water quality standards
watershed management
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top